Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison

iBstone AuraLink vs Lucid Ultra 128

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Hero Image (optional)
iBstoneSoundGrade B

iBstone AuraLink

HearAdvisor lab-tested performance overview.

Expert Choice
Expert
Choice
Lucid Ultra 128  Hero
LucidSoundGrade A

Lucid Ultra 128

HearAdvisor lab-tested performance overview.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Speech in quiet
iBstone AuraLink2.2
Lucid Ultra 1284.4
Speech in noise
iBstone AuraLink-0.1
Lucid Ultra 1282.5
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Lucid Ultra 1282.9
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Lucid Ultra 1281.7
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Lucid Ultra 1282.3

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

iBstone AuraLinkLucid Ultra 128
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingClosed Vented Dome
ReceiverDefault
ReceiverStandard
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening ProgramLucid (Automatic)
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume Setting54% (Default 7/13)
Software Version1.0.5
Software VersionBT Firmware v12.0.29, Firmware v9.2.33
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram by Lucid team, LucidShape adjusted to match NAL-NL2 targets at 65 dB SPL, Other settings at manufacturer default
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
NotesDefault programming was performed by Lucid team, further adjustments were limited as we did not have access to their proprietary software.