Eargo SE vs Lucid Ultra 128

The Eargo SE is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid at $1,699, featuring an invisible-in-ear design and earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the top 85% of the OTC hearing aid category, ranking #56 of 65 devices tested. In our testing, the Eargo SE demonstrated solid performance in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 3.2/5—0.43 points above the category average. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.6/5, meaning users should experience stable performance without whistling issues. However, the device showed limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech in noise scoring 1.3/5, which falls 0.23 points below the category average. A notable weakness is the complete absence of music streaming capability, scoring 0.0/5 compared to the category average of 1.92/5. Own-voice comfort scored 2.4/5, slightly below the category average. These mixed results suggest the Eargo SE prioritizes its discreet form factor over comprehensive audio features. The Eargo SE may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible design and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, given its premium price point and the availability of alternatives like the Jabra Enhance Select 50R that deliver stronger overall scores at lower prices, value-conscious consumers may want to explore other options before committing.

The Lucid Ultra 128 is a premium behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $5,000, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.4/5 in our lab testing. It ranks #17 among 39 prescription hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 41% of its category. Speech performance is where the Lucid Ultra 128 truly excels. In our lab testing, speech in quiet scored a strong 4.3/5, which is 0.95 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance reached 2.7/5, which sits above the category average by 0.59 points, though it remains mixed in absolute terms. This suggests the device handles conversational clarity well in our test scenarios, particularly in quieter environments. The device does face some challenges. Feedback handling scored just 1.7/5, falling 3.02 points below the category average of 4.72/5—a notable weakness compared to other prescription aids in our testing. Music streaming also came in below average at 2.3/5, which is 0.46 points under the category norm. Own-voice comfort scored a mixed 2.9/5, slightly above average. At this price point, several competitors in our database achieved higher overall scores, including the Phonak Sphere Infinio and Oticon Intent. The Lucid Ultra 128 features disposable batteries and supports both iPhone and Android streaming. It may appeal to users who prioritize speech clarity in quiet settings and are less concerned about feedback stability or music streaming fidelity in our standardized tests.