Eargo Link vs RCA In-Ear

The Eargo Link is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2024, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing. At $799, it ranks #15 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 22% of the category. In our testing, the Eargo Link demonstrates notable strengths in music streaming, scoring 4.4/5—a strong result that sits 2.48 points above the category average. This makes it a standout choice for users who prioritize audio quality when streaming from their phone. Speech performance is solid, with speech in quiet measuring 3.2/5 (0.42 points above average) and speech in noise at 2.0/5 (0.54 points above average, though mixed in absolute terms). Feedback handling is excellent at 4.7/5. The main limitation is own-voice comfort, which scores 1.3/5—a low result that falls 1.21 points below the category average. Users sensitive to the sound of their own voice may find this challenging, particularly with the closed dome configuration used in the tuned fit. The Eargo Link supports both iPhone and Android streaming with hands-free capability and uses rechargeable batteries. It's best suited for those who value exceptional music streaming quality and solid speech clarity, and who can tolerate some own-voice occlusion. Competitors in this price range include higher-scoring options like the Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10, though the Eargo Link's streaming performance remains a differentiator.

The RCA In-Ear is a budget OTC hearing aid priced at $249, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.8/5 in our lab testing. This places it near the bottom of the OTC category at #64 of 65 devices tested. Speech performance is a significant weakness for this device. Speech in quiet scores just 1.0/5, falling 1.79 points below the category average, while speech in noise also scores 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. These low absolute scores indicate limited benefit for understanding conversation in most listening situations. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, measuring 1.92 points below the category average—this device is not suitable for audio entertainment. The RCA In-Ear does show strength in feedback handling, scoring an excellent 5.0/5, which is 0.46 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort is mixed at 2.6/5, essentially matching the category average with only a 0.09-point advantage. The rechargeable battery design offers convenience for daily use. At this price point, consumers have substantially higher-performing alternatives. Devices like the Elehear Beyond (4.36/5), Apple AirPods Pro 2 (4.06/5), and several others in the same budget range deliver meaningfully better speech clarity and overall sound quality. The RCA In-Ear may appeal to those prioritizing feedback-free operation above all else, but most users seeking improved hearing will find better value elsewhere in the OTC market.