Eargo Link vs Fortell AI Hearing Aids

The Eargo Link is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid that earned an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 22% of the OTC hearing aid category. At $799, this visible-in-ear style device offers a balance of solid speech performance and exceptional streaming capabilities. In our testing, the Eargo Link demonstrated strong music streaming quality, scoring 2.48 points above the category average—a standout result for consumers who prioritize audio entertainment. Speech in quiet environments also performed well at 0.42 points above average, while speech in noise scored above the category average but remained mixed in absolute terms at 2.0/5. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.7/5. The most notable limitation is own-voice comfort, which scored 1.3/5—significantly below the category average by 1.21 points. Users sensitive to hearing their own voice may find this distracting, particularly with the closed dome configuration used in our tuned fit. The Eargo Link features rechargeable batteries and supports both iPhone and Android streaming with hands-free functionality. It's best suited for consumers who value premium streaming audio quality and solid speech clarity in quieter settings, and who can tolerate some own-voice compromise. Those prioritizing speech in noise or own-voice comfort may want to consider alternatives like the Sony CRE-E10 or Lexie B2 Plus in this price range.

The Fortell AI Hearing Aids are a premium prescription behind-the-ear device priced at $6,800, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 6.0/5 in HearAdvisor lab testing—an exceptional result that places this device at the top of the prescription hearing aid category. Speech performance is where the Fortell AI truly distinguishes itself. Speech in noise scores an outstanding 6.0/5, a full 3.89 points above the category average of 2.11/5—the kind of margin that represents a meaningful difference in challenging listening environments like restaurants or group conversations. Speech in quiet also excels at 4.6/5, sitting 1.20 points above the category average. Music streaming performs strongly at 4.2/5, coming in 1.44 points above average for the category. The device does have a notable limitation: own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.20 points below the category average. This low absolute score suggests wearers may notice occlusion effects when speaking. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.8/5, essentially matching the category average. Best suited for: Users who prioritize understanding speech in difficult listening situations and value streaming quality, and who can tolerate potential own-voice occlusion. Given the premium price point, buyers should weigh whether the exceptional speech-in-noise performance justifies the investment compared to alternatives like the Oticon Intent or Oticon Zeal, which offer strong performance at lower price points.