Lucid Ultra 128 vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The Lucid Ultra 128 is a premium behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $5,000, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.4/5 in our lab testing. It ranks #16 of 36 devices in the Prescription Hearing Aid category. Speech performance is a clear strength for the Ultra 128. In our testing, speech in quiet scored a strong 4.3/5, landing 1.03 points above the category average. Speech in noise measured 2.7/5—above the category average by 0.74 points, though mixed in absolute terms. These results suggest the device prioritizes intelligibility in everyday listening situations. The Ultra 128 does show notable weaknesses. Feedback handling scored just 1.7/5, falling 3.01 points below the category average of 4.71/5—a significant gap that prospective buyers should consider. Music streaming measured 2.3/5, slightly below the category average. Own-voice comfort was mixed at 2.9/5, though this sits just above the category norm. The device uses disposable batteries and supports streaming to both iPhone and Android. At this price point, buyers may want to compare against higher-scoring competitors like the Phonak Sphere Infinio (5.0/5) or Oticon Intent (4.85/5). The Lucid Ultra 128 may suit those who prioritize speech clarity in quieter environments and can work with their hearing care provider to manage its feedback limitations.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.