Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Linner Mercury vs Otofonix Groove

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Linner Mercury Hero
LinnerSoundScore 3.0Grade B

Linner Mercury

The Linner Mercury is a budget OTC hearing aid priced at $387, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.0/5 in our lab testing. This visible-in-ear style device ranks #60 of 65 in the OTC Hearing Aid category, positioning it in the lower tier of available options. In our standardized testing, the Mercury demonstrates excellent feedback handling at 4.7/5, scoring 0.16 points above the category average. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during typical wear. However, the device shows limitations in other key areas. Speech in quiet scores 2.2/5, falling 0.62 points below the category average, while speech in noise performance is low at 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. Own-voice comfort is also low at 1.6/5, measuring 0.91 points below the category average. The most significant limitation is music streaming, which scores 0.0/5—a full 1.92 points below the category average. Users who plan to stream phone calls or music through their hearing aids should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors like the Elehear Beyond and Apple AirPods Pro 2 offer substantially higher overall scores. The Linner Mercury may suit budget-conscious first-time users who prioritize stable, feedback-free wear over streaming capabilities or challenging listening environments. However, those seeking better speech clarity or music quality should explore other options in this price range.

Otofonix Groove Hero
OtofonixSoundScore 2.7Grade C

Otofonix Groove

The Otofonix Groove is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $795, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. This rechargeable BTE ranks #38 of 39 devices in the prescription hearing aid category, placing it in the bottom 5% of its class. In our testing, the Groove demonstrated excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, scoring 0.28 points above the category average. This represents a genuine strength, with the device maintaining stability during our standardized challenge motions. However, speech performance was significantly limited, with speech in quiet scoring 1.0/5 (2.40 points below the category average of 3.40) and speech in noise also at 1.0/5 (1.11 points below average). Music streaming was not functional in our tests, scoring 0.0/5 against a category average of 2.76. Own-voice comfort also fell well below typical prescription hearing aid performance at 0.4/5, which is 2.30 points below the category average. At this price point, several lower-cost alternatives delivered stronger overall performance in our testing. Consumers seeking value in the prescription category may want to explore other options, though those requiring robust feedback control in a rechargeable BTE format may find the Groove's stability noteworthy despite its other limitations.

We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Linner Mercury2.2
Otofonix Groove1.0
Speech in noiseNew
Linner Mercury1.0
Otofonix Groove1.0
Own voice
Linner Mercury1.6
Otofonix Groove0.4
Feedback handling
Linner Mercury4.7
Otofonix Groove5.0
Music streaming
Linner Mercury0.0
Otofonix Groove0.0
Overall fit score
Linner Mercury3.0
Otofonix Groove2.5

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Audio scenes

Recorded samples (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Linner MercuryOtofonix Groove
Ear CouplingPower Dome
Ear CouplingClosed Dome