Jabra Enhance Plus vs Zepp Clarity Pixie
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Jabra Enhance Plus
The Jabra Enhance Plus is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid ($799) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing, ranking #28 of 65 devices in the OTC category. This visible-in-ear device delivers strong speech-in-quiet performance, scoring 4.2/5—a full 1.36 points above the category average. Music streaming is another highlight at 3.8/5, nearly 1.9 points above average, making it a solid choice for users who value audio quality beyond speech. Speech-in-noise performance scores 2.1/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but remains mixed in absolute terms for challenging listening environments. The most significant limitation is own-voice comfort, scoring just 0.3/5—well below the category average of 2.51/5. Users sensitive to how their own voice sounds while wearing hearing aids should consider this trade-off carefully. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.7/5, meaning wearers can expect stable performance without whistling or squealing. The Jabra Enhance Plus is best suited for users who prioritize clear speech in quieter settings and enjoy streaming music or calls to their iPhone. Those frequently in noisy environments or particularly bothered by occlusion effects may want to explore alternatives. Several competitors in the same price range achieve higher overall scores, including the Sony CRE-E10 and Lexie B2 Plus.

Zepp Clarity Pixie
The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of OTC hearing aids tested. Speech clarity is a notable strength for the Pixie. It scores 3.6/5 for speech in quiet—a solid result that sits 0.77 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is above the category average as well, though at 1.7/5 it remains low in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. Music streaming is a particular weakness, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average. Those who frequently stream phone audio should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10 both score above 4.6/5 at similar prices. The Elehear Delight and Yeasound RIC700 deliver scores around 4.3/5 at lower price points. The Pixie may appeal to users who prioritize its discreet invisible-in-ear form factor and primarily need speech clarity in quieter environments, but those seeking well-rounded performance or music streaming should explore alternatives.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit