Jabra Enhance Plus vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Jabra Enhance Plus
The Jabra Enhance Plus is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid ($799) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing, ranking #28 of 65 devices in the OTC category. This visible-in-ear device delivers strong speech-in-quiet performance, scoring 4.2/5—a full 1.36 points above the category average. Music streaming is another highlight at 3.8/5, nearly 1.9 points above average, making it a solid choice for users who value audio quality beyond speech. Speech-in-noise performance scores 2.1/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but remains mixed in absolute terms for challenging listening environments. The most significant limitation is own-voice comfort, scoring just 0.3/5—well below the category average of 2.51/5. Users sensitive to how their own voice sounds while wearing hearing aids should consider this trade-off carefully. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.7/5, meaning wearers can expect stable performance without whistling or squealing. The Jabra Enhance Plus is best suited for users who prioritize clear speech in quieter settings and enjoy streaming music or calls to their iPhone. Those frequently in noisy environments or particularly bothered by occlusion effects may want to explore alternatives. Several competitors in the same price range achieve higher overall scores, including the Sony CRE-E10 and Lexie B2 Plus.

Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
The Signia Silk Charge&Go IX is a premium-priced invisible-in-ear prescription hearing aid currently available at $3,298. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.7/5, ranking #30 of 36 prescription hearing aids tested. This device delivers excellent speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 4.6/5—a full 1.30 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is mixed at 2.2/5, though still slightly above average for the category. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, providing reliable stability during daily wear. The Silk Charge&Go IX has notable limitations. Own-voice comfort scores low at 1.5/5, falling 1.25 points below the category average—a consideration for users sensitive to how their own voice sounds while wearing hearing aids. Most significantly, the device scored 0.0/5 for music streaming, meaning it lacks practical streaming capability from phones or other devices. At this price point, competitors like the Phonak Sphere Infinio (5.0/5), Oticon Intent (4.85/5), and Signia's own Active Pro IX (4.67/5) deliver substantially higher overall sound performance. The Silk Charge&Go IX may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible form factor and strong speech clarity in quiet settings, but those who value music streaming or own-voice comfort should explore alternatives.
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit