Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
iBstone AuraLink vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
iBstone AuraLink2.2
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.5
Speech in noise
iBstone AuraLink-0.1
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX2.6
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX1.5
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.3
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX0.0
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
iBstone AuraLinkSignia Silk Charge&Go IX
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
ReceiverDefault
Receiver–
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting Formula–
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening Program–
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume Setting–
Software Version1.0.5
Software Version–
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning Adjustments–
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
Notes–