Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
iBstone AuraLink vs Signia Pure C&G BCT IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
iBstone AuraLink2.2
Signia Pure C&G BCT IX4.1
Speech in noise
iBstone AuraLink-0.1
Signia Pure C&G BCT IX2.6
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Signia Pure C&G BCT IX3.8
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Signia Pure C&G BCT IX4.2
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Signia Pure C&G BCT IX2.7
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
iBstone AuraLinkSignia Pure C&G BCT IX
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingSleeve Vented
ReceiverDefault
Receiver110/46
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting FormulaIXFit (Manufacturer proprietary targets)
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening ProgramUniversal (Automatic)
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume SettingAdjusted to match NAL-NL2 targets at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL
Software Version1.0.5
Software VersionSoftware v9.13.0.281, SiFit v9.13.0.1189
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram, Feedback calibrated, Experience Level set at "Experienced", Other settings at manufacturer defaults
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
Notes–