Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison
iBstone AuraLink vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech in quiet
iBstone AuraLink2.2
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)2.6
Speech in noise
iBstone AuraLink-0.1
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)1.3
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)4.7
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)1.9
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)4.3
Overall fit score
iBstone AuraLink3.2
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)3.7
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
iBstone AuraLinkMeta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingOther
ReceiverDefault
ReceiverIntegrated in device
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening ProgramBoosted
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume Setting5/5 (100%)
Software Version1.0.5
Software Version–
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning AdjustmentsConversation Focus enabled
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
Notes–