Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
iBstone AuraLink vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
iBstone AuraLink2.2
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)2.6
Speech in noise
iBstone AuraLink-0.1
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)1.3
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)4.7
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)1.9
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)4.3
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
iBstone AuraLinkMeta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingOther
ReceiverDefault
ReceiverIntegrated in device
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening ProgramBoosted
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume Setting5/5 (100%)
Software Version1.0.5
Software Version–
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning AdjustmentsConversation Focus enabled
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
Notes–