Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

iBstone AuraLink vs Linner Mars

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Product Image
iBstoneSoundGrade B

iBstone AuraLink

The iBstone AuraLink is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2024, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This behind-the-ear device ranks #33 among 65 tested OTC hearing aids, placing it in the top 49% of its category. In our testing, the AuraLink shows a distinctive performance profile with notable strengths in audio entertainment. Music streaming scored a solid 3.6/5, measuring 1.68 points above the category average—a standout result for an OTC device. Feedback handling earned an excellent 5.0/5, sitting 0.46 points above average, meaning users should experience minimal whistling during daily wear. However, speech clarity presents a different picture. Speech in quiet scored a mixed 2.3/5, falling 0.47 points below the category average of 2.79. Speech in noise performance was low at 1.0/5, trailing the already modest category average by 0.48 points. Own-voice comfort scored 2.7/5, slightly above average but only mixed in absolute terms. At $649, the AuraLink faces competition from alternatives offering similar or better sound performance at lower prices, including the iHear MatriX and Olive Union Max. The AuraLink may appeal to users who prioritize music and media streaming over speech enhancement, but those seeking stronger speech clarity should explore other options in this price range.

Linner Mars Hero
LinnerSoundGrade B

Linner Mars

The Linner Mars is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2023, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.2/5 in our lab testing. At $399, it falls in the lower price tier of the OTC category but ranks #55 of 65 OTC devices tested, placing it in the bottom 17% of its category. This visible-in-ear device presents a mixed performance profile with notable strengths and significant weaknesses. Music streaming is a standout feature, scoring an excellent 4.6/5—a full 2.68 points above the category average. Feedback handling is also excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users can expect stable performance without whistling during normal use. However, speech clarity presents challenges. Speech in quiet scores a low 1.9/5, falling 0.85 points below the category average. Speech in noise performance is particularly limited at 1.0/5, sitting 0.46 points below average. Own-voice comfort also scores low at 1.0/5, which is 1.51 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounding unnatural or boomy. The Linner Mars may suit budget-conscious consumers who prioritize music and media streaming over speech understanding in challenging environments. However, buyers seeking better speech performance should consider alternatives like the Elehear Beyond or Apple AirPods Pro 2, which offer stronger overall sound scores in the same price range.

We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
iBstone AuraLink2.3
Linner Mars1.9
Speech in noiseNew
iBstone AuraLink1.0
Linner Mars1.0
Own voice
iBstone AuraLink2.7
Linner Mars1.0
Feedback handling
iBstone AuraLink5.0
Linner Mars5.0
Music streaming
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Linner Mars4.6
Overall fit score
iBstone AuraLink3.6
Linner Mars3.4

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

iBstone AuraLinkLinner Mars
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingClosed Dome
ReceiverDefault
Receiver
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting Formula
Listening ProgramOutdoor (Noisy)
Listening Program
Volume SettingLeft 15%; Right 25%
Volume Setting
Software Version1.0.5
Software Version
Tuning Adjustmentsn/a
Tuning Adjustments
NotesInitial and Tuned fits identical as subsequent setting changes maintained or degraded performance
Notes