HearingAssist Control vs Zepp Clarity Pixie

The HearingAssist Control is a behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid priced at $549, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the lower portion of the OTC category, ranking #51 of 65 devices tested. In our testing, the Control demonstrates notable strengths in speech performance. Speech in quiet scores 0.59 points above the category average at 3.4/5, representing solid absolute performance. Speech in noise comes in at 2.0/5—above the category average by 0.56 points, though only mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning the device remained stable without audible squealing during our standardized challenge tests. The device shows significant weaknesses in other areas. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average and indicates this device does not support or perform well with phone audio streaming. Own-voice comfort is also below average at 2.1/5 (0.41 points below category average), which may be noticeable during extended conversations. The HearingAssist Control may suit users who prioritize speech clarity over streaming functionality and who don't require premium sound quality across all use cases. However, buyers in this price range should note that several competitors—including the Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10—deliver substantially higher overall scores. Those seeking similar speech performance at a lower cost may also consider the iHear MatriX.

The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of OTC hearing aids tested. Speech clarity is a notable strength for the Pixie. It scores 3.6/5 for speech in quiet—a solid result that sits 0.77 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is above the category average as well, though at 1.7/5 it remains low in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. Music streaming is a particular weakness, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average. Those who frequently stream phone audio should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10 both score above 4.6/5 at similar prices. The Elehear Delight and Yeasound RIC700 deliver scores around 4.3/5 at lower price points. The Pixie may appeal to users who prioritize its discreet invisible-in-ear form factor and primarily need speech clarity in quieter environments, but those seeking well-rounded performance or music streaming should explore alternatives.