GoHearing Ultra vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The GoHearing Ultra is a budget-priced behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. At $499, it sits in the most affordable price tier of the OTC market, though its overall sound performance ranks #58 of 65 devices in its category. In our testing, the Ultra shows a distinctive performance profile with significant strengths and weaknesses. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, scoring 0.46 points above the category average—users can expect stable operation without whistling during typical wear. Music streaming quality is also a genuine strength at 3.6/5, performing 1.68 points above average, making it notably better for phone audio than most OTC devices. However, speech clarity scores reveal meaningful limitations. Speech in quiet environments measured just 1.0/5, which is 1.79 points below the category average and low in absolute terms. Speech in noise similarly scored 1.0/5, falling 0.48 points below average. Own-voice comfort rated 1.9/5, also below the category norm. These results suggest the Ultra may struggle to deliver the speech audibility improvements that many users prioritize. The GoHearing Ultra may suit budget-conscious consumers who primarily want reliable streaming audio and feedback-free operation, and who have modest expectations for speech enhancement. However, several competitors in the same price range—including the Elehear Beyond and Apple AirPods Pro 2—deliver substantially stronger overall sound performance. Users prioritizing speech clarity should consider these alternatives despite similar pricing.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product in the hearing glasses style, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $375, this device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, this product demonstrated exceptional strengths in music streaming quality, scoring 4.3/5—a remarkable 3.14 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort was equally impressive at 4.7/5, exceeding the category average by over 2 points. These results suggest Meta has prioritized the audio experience that their glasses are known for, delivering strong fidelity for streamed content and minimal occlusion-related discomfort. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.7/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise measured 1.6/5—still above average for the category, but low overall. The most notable weakness is feedback handling at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) are best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and comfort over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking amplification primarily for challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech-in-noise performance.