GoHearing Ultra vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The GoHearing Ultra is a budget-priced OTC behind-the-ear hearing aid that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. At $499, it sits in the most affordable tier of OTC devices, though its overall performance ranks 58th out of 65 OTC hearing aids tested. This device shows a distinctive performance profile with notable strengths in specific areas. Feedback handling earned an excellent 5.0/5, scoring 0.46 points above the category average—meaning users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during typical use. Music streaming also performed well at 3.6/5, a solid score that sits 1.68 points above the OTC average of 1.92/5, making it a reasonable choice for those who prioritize phone audio streaming. However, the GoHearing Ultra struggles in core speech understanding metrics. Speech in quiet scored just 1.0/5, falling 1.79 points below the category average, while speech in noise also scored 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. Own-voice comfort measured 1.9/5, which is 0.61 points below the typical OTC device. These low speech scores significantly limit the device's utility for its primary purpose of improving conversation clarity. Consumers seeking better overall value in this price range may want to consider alternatives like the Elehear Beyond (4.36/5) or Apple AirPods Pro 2 (4.06/5), which deliver substantially stronger speech performance. The GoHearing Ultra may suit buyers who prioritize streaming audio and feedback-free wear over speech enhancement, but those seeking meaningful speech benefit should explore higher-performing options.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.