Fortell AI Hearing Aids vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The Fortell AI Hearing Aids are a premium prescription behind-the-ear device priced at $6,800, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 6.0/5 in HearAdvisor lab testing—an exceptional result that places this device at the top of the prescription hearing aid category. Speech performance is where the Fortell AI truly distinguishes itself. Speech in noise scores an outstanding 6.0/5, a full 3.89 points above the category average of 2.11/5—the kind of margin that represents a meaningful difference in challenging listening environments like restaurants or group conversations. Speech in quiet also excels at 4.6/5, sitting 1.20 points above the category average. Music streaming performs strongly at 4.2/5, coming in 1.44 points above average for the category. The device does have a notable limitation: own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.20 points below the category average. This low absolute score suggests wearers may notice occlusion effects when speaking. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.8/5, essentially matching the category average. Best suited for: Users who prioritize understanding speech in difficult listening situations and value streaming quality, and who can tolerate potential own-voice occlusion. Given the premium price point, buyers should weigh whether the exceptional speech-in-noise performance justifies the investment compared to alternatives like the Oticon Intent or Oticon Zeal, which offer strong performance at lower price points.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product in the hearing glasses style, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $375, this device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, this product demonstrated exceptional strengths in music streaming quality, scoring 4.3/5—a remarkable 3.14 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort was equally impressive at 4.7/5, exceeding the category average by over 2 points. These results suggest Meta has prioritized the audio experience that their glasses are known for, delivering strong fidelity for streamed content and minimal occlusion-related discomfort. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.7/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise measured 1.6/5—still above average for the category, but low overall. The most notable weakness is feedback handling at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) are best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and comfort over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking amplification primarily for challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech-in-noise performance.