Eargo SE vs Vivtone Xpure Hearing Aid

The Eargo SE is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid at $1,699, featuring an invisible-in-ear design and earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the top 85% of the OTC hearing aid category, ranking #56 of 65 devices tested. In our testing, the Eargo SE demonstrated solid performance in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 3.2/5—0.43 points above the category average. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.6/5, meaning users should experience stable performance without whistling issues. However, the device showed limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech in noise scoring 1.3/5, which falls 0.23 points below the category average. A notable weakness is the complete absence of music streaming capability, scoring 0.0/5 compared to the category average of 1.92/5. Own-voice comfort scored 2.4/5, slightly below the category average. These mixed results suggest the Eargo SE prioritizes its discreet form factor over comprehensive audio features. The Eargo SE may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible design and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, given its premium price point and the availability of alternatives like the Jabra Enhance Select 50R that deliver stronger overall scores at lower prices, value-conscious consumers may want to explore other options before committing.

The Vivtone Xpure is a behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid priced at $549, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This places it in the lower tier of the OTC category, ranking #57 of 65 devices tested. The Xpure demonstrates a notably uneven performance profile. Its standout strength is music streaming, scoring an excellent 4.4/5—a remarkable 2.48 points above the category average. This makes it one of the better choices for users who prioritize audio entertainment through their hearing aids. Speech in quiet performs just slightly above category average at 2.9/5, though this remains mixed in absolute terms. However, the device shows significant weaknesses in several areas. Own-voice comfort scores a low 0.8/5, falling 1.71 points below the category average—a notable concern for users sensitive to how their own voice sounds. Speech in noise at 1.2/5 sits below the category average, and feedback handling, while solid at 3.3/5, still falls 1.24 points below what typical OTC devices achieve. The Xpure improves meaningfully with professional tuning, jumping from a normalized Initial Score of 3.0/5 to a Tuned Score of 3.5/5. Shoppers prioritizing music streaming may find value here, but those seeking balanced speech performance or natural own-voice quality should consider alternatives like the Linner Nova Earbud or Nuheara IQBuds Max, which offer higher overall scores at lower prices.