Eargo SE vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The Eargo SE is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid at $1,699, featuring an invisible-in-ear design and earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the top 85% of the OTC hearing aid category, ranking #56 of 65 devices tested. In our testing, the Eargo SE demonstrated solid performance in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 3.2/5—0.43 points above the category average. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.6/5, meaning users should experience stable performance without whistling issues. However, the device showed limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech in noise scoring 1.3/5, which falls 0.23 points below the category average. A notable weakness is the complete absence of music streaming capability, scoring 0.0/5 compared to the category average of 1.92/5. Own-voice comfort scored 2.4/5, slightly below the category average. These mixed results suggest the Eargo SE prioritizes its discreet form factor over comprehensive audio features. The Eargo SE may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible design and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, given its premium price point and the availability of alternatives like the Jabra Enhance Select 50R that deliver stronger overall scores at lower prices, value-conscious consumers may want to explore other options before committing.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product in the hearing glasses style, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $375, this device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, this product demonstrated exceptional strengths in music streaming quality, scoring 4.3/5—a remarkable 3.14 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort was equally impressive at 4.7/5, exceeding the category average by over 2 points. These results suggest Meta has prioritized the audio experience that their glasses are known for, delivering strong fidelity for streamed content and minimal occlusion-related discomfort. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.7/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise measured 1.6/5—still above average for the category, but low overall. The most notable weakness is feedback handling at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) are best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and comfort over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking amplification primarily for challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech-in-noise performance.