Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Eargo SE vs MDHearing Volt

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Product Image
EargoSoundScore 3.1Grade B

Eargo SE

The Eargo SE is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid at $1,699, featuring an invisible-in-ear design and earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the top 85% of the OTC hearing aid category, ranking #56 of 65 devices tested. In our testing, the Eargo SE demonstrated solid performance in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 3.2/5—0.43 points above the category average. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.6/5, meaning users should experience stable performance without whistling issues. However, the device showed limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech in noise scoring 1.3/5, which falls 0.23 points below the category average. A notable weakness is the complete absence of music streaming capability, scoring 0.0/5 compared to the category average of 1.92/5. Own-voice comfort scored 2.4/5, slightly below the category average. These mixed results suggest the Eargo SE prioritizes its discreet form factor over comprehensive audio features. The Eargo SE may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible design and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, given its premium price point and the availability of alternatives like the Jabra Enhance Select 50R that deliver stronger overall scores at lower prices, value-conscious consumers may want to explore other options before committing.

MDHearing Volt Hero
MDSoundScore 3.0Grade B

MDHearing Volt

The MDHearing Volt is a budget-priced prescription hearing aid released in 2020, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.0/5 in our lab testing. At $397, it sits in the lowest price tier for prescription devices, ranking #34 of 39 in its category. In our testing, the Volt showed a mixed performance profile with one standout strength: feedback handling scored an excellent 5.0/5, which is 0.28 points above the category average. This means users can expect minimal whistling or squealing during typical wear. However, speech performance was limited, with speech in quiet scoring 1.8/5 (1.65 points below average) and speech in noise at 1.0/5 (1.11 points below average). Own voice comfort was mixed at 2.6/5, roughly matching the category average. Music streaming capability was not functional in our testing, scoring 0.0/5—a significant limitation for users who want to stream audio from their phone. This is 2.76 points below the prescription hearing aid category average. The Volt may appeal to budget-conscious consumers who prioritize basic amplification and feedback-free wear over advanced speech enhancement or streaming features. Those seeking stronger speech performance in the same price range may want to consider alternatives like the RxEars Rxi, which scored 4.07/5 in our testing. The Volt's rechargeable battery and behind-the-ear design offer practical convenience, but its core sound performance reflects its entry-level positioning.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Eargo SE3.2
MDHearing Volt1.8
Speech in noiseNew
Eargo SE1.3
MDHearing Volt1.0
Own voice
Eargo SE2.4
MDHearing Volt2.6
Feedback handling
Eargo SE4.6
MDHearing Volt5.0
Music streaming
Eargo SE0.0
MDHearing Volt0.0
Overall fit score
Eargo SE3.5
MDHearing Volt3.0

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Eargo SEMDHearing Volt
Ear CouplingTrumpet
Ear CouplingSleeve Closed
ReceiverIntegrated in device
Receiver–
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting Formula–
Listening ProgramRestaurant
Listening Program–
Volume Setting2 clicks above default.
Volume Setting–
Software Versionv6.6.0
Software Version–
Tuning AdjustmentsOther settings at manufacturer defaults.
Tuning Adjustments–