Eargo Link vs HearingAssist Micro

The Eargo Link is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2024, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing. At $799, it ranks #15 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 22% of the category. In our testing, the Eargo Link demonstrates notable strengths in music streaming, scoring 4.4/5—a strong result that sits 2.48 points above the category average. This makes it a standout choice for users who prioritize audio quality when streaming from their phone. Speech performance is solid, with speech in quiet measuring 3.2/5 (0.42 points above average) and speech in noise at 2.0/5 (0.54 points above average, though mixed in absolute terms). Feedback handling is excellent at 4.7/5. The main limitation is own-voice comfort, which scores 1.3/5—a low result that falls 1.21 points below the category average. Users sensitive to the sound of their own voice may find this challenging, particularly with the closed dome configuration used in the tuned fit. The Eargo Link supports both iPhone and Android streaming with hands-free capability and uses rechargeable batteries. It's best suited for those who value exceptional music streaming quality and solid speech clarity, and who can tolerate some own-voice occlusion. Competitors in this price range include higher-scoring options like the Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10, though the Eargo Link's streaming performance remains a differentiator.

The HearingAssist Micro is a premium amplifier in the invisible-in-ear style, priced at $698. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it #3 among the 8 amplification products we've tested. This device shows a clear strength in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—a solid result that sits 1.35 points above the category average of 2.11/5. Feedback handling is also strong at 4.0/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.28/5. Own-voice comfort comes in at 2.8/5, which is above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. The Micro has notable limitations. Speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.1/5, falling 0.31 points below the category average. Music streaming is where this device struggles most significantly, scoring 0.0/5—well below the already modest category average of 1.16/5. Users who want to stream audio from their phone should look elsewhere. The HearingAssist Micro may suit those prioritizing discreet, invisible-in-ear design and clear speech understanding in quieter settings. However, buyers seeking strong noise management or any music streaming capability should consider alternatives. At this price point, the Sennheiser Conversation Clear Plus offers notably higher overall performance, while options like the iHear MatriX deliver similar sound quality at a lower price.