Eargo Link vs HearingAssist Micro

The Eargo Link is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid that earned an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 22% of the OTC hearing aid category. At $799, this visible-in-ear style device offers a balance of solid speech performance and exceptional streaming capabilities. In our testing, the Eargo Link demonstrated strong music streaming quality, scoring 2.48 points above the category average—a standout result for consumers who prioritize audio entertainment. Speech in quiet environments also performed well at 0.42 points above average, while speech in noise scored above the category average but remained mixed in absolute terms at 2.0/5. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.7/5. The most notable limitation is own-voice comfort, which scored 1.3/5—significantly below the category average by 1.21 points. Users sensitive to hearing their own voice may find this distracting, particularly with the closed dome configuration used in our tuned fit. The Eargo Link features rechargeable batteries and supports both iPhone and Android streaming with hands-free functionality. It's best suited for consumers who value premium streaming audio quality and solid speech clarity in quieter settings, and who can tolerate some own-voice compromise. Those prioritizing speech in noise or own-voice comfort may want to consider alternatives like the Sony CRE-E10 or Lexie B2 Plus in this price range.

The HearingAssist Micro is a premium amplifier in the invisible-in-ear style, priced at $698. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.5/5, ranking #3 among 8 tested amplification products and placing in the top 25% of its category. This device demonstrates a clear strength in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—a solid result that sits 1.35 points above the category average of 2.11/5. Feedback handling is also strong at 4.0/5, providing stable performance during typical use. Own-voice comfort lands at 2.8/5, which is above the category average by 0.16 points, though still mixed in absolute terms. However, the Micro shows notable limitations in more challenging listening situations. Speech in noise scored just 1.1/5, falling 0.31 points below the category average—a meaningful weakness for users who frequently encounter background noise. Music streaming is where this device struggles most significantly, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.16 points below the already-low category average. The HearingAssist Micro is best suited for listeners who primarily need amplification for face-to-face conversations in quiet settings and prioritize a discreet, nearly invisible form factor. Those who rely on phone streaming for music or podcasts, or who need robust performance in noisy environments, should consider alternatives. Within its price range, the Sennheiser Conversation Clear Plus offers notably higher overall performance at a similar investment.