Eargo 8 vs RCA In-Ear

The Eargo 8 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design with rechargeable batteries, priced at $2,399. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.4/5, placing it in the top 71% of the OTC Hearing Aid category. Sound performance presents a mixed picture. The Eargo 8 delivers solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.1/5, scoring 0.27 points above the category average—making it a reasonable choice for conversational settings without background noise. Own-voice comfort is another strength, measuring 0.69 points above average at 3.2/5, which may appeal to users who are sensitive to hearing their own voice through hearing aids. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average. However, the device shows notable weaknesses in challenging listening environments. Speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.2/5, falling 0.27 points below the category average—users who frequently encounter noisy restaurants, busy offices, or social gatherings may find this limiting. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, significantly below the category average, making this device unsuitable for users who prioritize audio entertainment through their hearing aids. The Eargo 8 is best suited for users who prioritize discreet, invisible-in-ear styling and primarily need assistance in quieter conversational settings. However, at this premium price point, buyers should be aware that similarly-priced alternatives and even some lower-cost options may offer comparable or better overall sound performance.

The RCA In-Ear is a budget OTC hearing aid priced at $249, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.8/5 in our lab testing. This places it near the bottom of the OTC category at #64 of 65 devices tested. Speech performance is a significant weakness for this device. Speech in quiet scores just 1.0/5, falling 1.79 points below the category average, while speech in noise also scores 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. These low absolute scores indicate limited benefit for understanding conversation in most listening situations. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, measuring 1.92 points below the category average—this device is not suitable for audio entertainment. The RCA In-Ear does show strength in feedback handling, scoring an excellent 5.0/5, which is 0.46 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort is mixed at 2.6/5, essentially matching the category average with only a 0.09-point advantage. The rechargeable battery design offers convenience for daily use. At this price point, consumers have substantially higher-performing alternatives. Devices like the Elehear Beyond (4.36/5), Apple AirPods Pro 2 (4.06/5), and several others in the same budget range deliver meaningfully better speech clarity and overall sound quality. The RCA In-Ear may appeal to those prioritizing feedback-free operation above all else, but most users seeking improved hearing will find better value elsewhere in the OTC market.