Eargo 8 vs HearingAssist Eaze

The Eargo 8 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,399) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device represents Eargo's 2025 flagship offering, featuring a rechargeable design that sits completely within the ear canal. In our testing, the Eargo 8 showed mixed performance across key metrics. Speech clarity in quiet environments is a relative strength, scoring 0.27 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also performs well, measuring 0.69 points above average at 3.2/5—a solid result that suggests reduced occlusion effects during conversation. However, speech understanding in noisy environments scored 1.2/5, which is both low in absolute terms and 0.27 points below the category average. The most significant limitation we measured was music streaming, which scored 0.0/5—nearly 2 points below the OTC average. This makes the Eargo 8 unsuitable for users who prioritize streaming audio quality. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average. At its premium price point, the Eargo 8 faces stiff competition. Several devices in our database deliver comparable or better sound performance at lower prices, including alternatives from Eargo's own lineup. The Eargo 8 is best suited for users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and own-voice comfort over streaming capability and value, and who primarily need help hearing speech in quieter settings.

The HearingAssist Eaze is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.4/5 in our lab testing. At $399, it positions itself as an affordable behind-the-ear option in the crowded OTC market, ranking #43 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested. In our testing, the Eaze showed mixed results across performance categories. Its standout strength is excellent feedback handling, scoring a perfect 5.0/5—0.46 points above the category average. This means users can expect stable performance without whistling during typical daily activities. However, speech performance is a weakness: speech in quiet scored 2.6/5 (0.20 points below average) and speech in noise scored just 1.3/5 (also 0.20 points below average), which may limit benefit in challenging listening environments. The most significant limitation is music streaming, which scored 0.0/5—nearly 2 points below the category average of 1.92/5. Consumers who prioritize streaming audio from their phones should consider alternatives. Own-voice comfort also scored below average at 2.2/5, which may affect how natural users sound to themselves. At this price point, buyers have several higher-scoring alternatives to consider, including the Elehear Beyond (4.34/5) and Apple AirPods Pro 2 (4.04/5). The Eaze may suit budget-conscious consumers who prioritize feedback-free wear over streaming capability and don't frequently encounter noisy environments.