Eargo 6 vs Jabra Enhance Plus

The Eargo 6 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,250) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.4/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device ranks #42 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 63% of its category. In our standardized testing, the Eargo 6 demonstrates solid speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 3.3/5—notably 0.53 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also performs above category average at 2.9/5, which may benefit users sensitive to the sound of their own voice. However, the device shows limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech-in-noise performance scoring 1.0/5, falling 0.48 points below the category average. A significant limitation is music streaming, which scores 0.0/5—well below the category average by 1.92 points. Users who prioritize streaming audio content should consider alternatives. Feedback handling scores 3.3/5, which is solid in absolute terms though 1.24 points below the category average of 4.54/5. The Eargo 6 may appeal to users prioritizing a completely invisible form factor and solid quiet-environment performance. However, at its premium price point, alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 offer stronger overall performance at a lower price. The rechargeable battery adds convenience, but buyers should weigh the device's limitations in noise and streaming against its aesthetic benefits.

The Jabra Enhance Plus is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid priced at $799, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.7/5 in our lab testing. This visible-in-ear device ranks #28 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 42% of its category. In our testing, the Enhance Plus demonstrated notable strengths in speech clarity and audio streaming. Speech in quiet scored a strong 4.2/5, measuring 1.36 points above the category average. Music streaming performance was equally impressive at 3.8/5, a full 1.88 points above average—making this a solid choice for users who prioritize phone audio streaming. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.7/5. However, the device has a significant weakness: own-voice comfort scored just 0.3/5, falling 2.21 points below the category average. This suggests pronounced occlusion effects that may make the user's own voice sound boomy or unnatural. Speech in noise performance was mixed at 2.1/5—above the category average by 0.62 points, but still limited in absolute terms for challenging listening environments. The Enhance Plus showed meaningful improvement with tuning, jumping from a normalized Initial Score of 3.6/5 to a Tuned Score of 4.2/5. Buyers should note that several competitors in the same price range score higher, including the Sony CRE-E10 at 4.66/5. This device is best suited for users who prioritize music streaming and speech clarity in quieter settings, and who can tolerate own-voice occlusion.