Eargo 5 vs GoHearing Ultra

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device offers a discreet rechargeable design, though its acoustic performance shows notable strengths and weaknesses compared to alternatives in its price range. In our testing, the Eargo 5 demonstrates solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.5/5, scoring 0.75 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also measures above average, which may appeal to users sensitive to occlusion effects. However, speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.4/5, and music streaming scores 0.0/5—significantly below the category average of 1.92/5. Users who prioritize phone streaming or frequently encounter noisy environments should consider these limitations. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The device uses closed sleeves for ear coupling in both initial and tuned configurations, with minimal score improvement from tuning (3.6 to 3.7/5). At this price point, competitors like the Lucid Tala (4.63/5) and Audicus Omni 2 (4.61/5) offer substantially higher overall sound performance. Budget-conscious shoppers may also find similar or better sound quality from lower-priced options like the Sony CRE-C10. The Eargo 5 may suit users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and quiet-environment listening over streaming and noise performance.

The GoHearing Ultra is a budget-priced OTC behind-the-ear hearing aid that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. At $499, it sits in the most affordable tier of OTC devices, though its overall performance ranks 58th out of 65 OTC hearing aids tested. This device shows a distinctive performance profile with notable strengths in specific areas. Feedback handling earned an excellent 5.0/5, scoring 0.46 points above the category average—meaning users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during typical use. Music streaming also performed well at 3.6/5, a solid score that sits 1.68 points above the OTC average of 1.92/5, making it a reasonable choice for those who prioritize phone audio streaming. However, the GoHearing Ultra struggles in core speech understanding metrics. Speech in quiet scored just 1.0/5, falling 1.79 points below the category average, while speech in noise also scored 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. Own-voice comfort measured 1.9/5, which is 0.61 points below the typical OTC device. These low speech scores significantly limit the device's utility for its primary purpose of improving conversation clarity. Consumers seeking better overall value in this price range may want to consider alternatives like the Elehear Beyond (4.36/5) or Apple AirPods Pro 2 (4.06/5), which deliver substantially stronger speech performance. The GoHearing Ultra may suit buyers who prioritize streaming audio and feedback-free wear over speech enhancement, but those seeking meaningful speech benefit should explore higher-performing options.