Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

EarCentric EasyCharge vs Zepp Clarity Pixie

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
EarCentric EasyCharge Hero
EarCentricSoundGrade C

EarCentric EasyCharge

The EarCentric EasyCharge is a budget-priced prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2023, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. At $229, it sits at the entry level of the prescription hearing aid market. In our standardized testing, this device showed a significant performance gap compared to the prescription hearing aid category. Speech clarity scores were notably low, measuring 2.32 points below the category average in quiet environments and 0.96 points below average in noisy settings. Music streaming performance was similarly limited at 0.0/5, falling 2.64 points below average. Own-voice comfort scored 1.9/5, which is 0.85 points below the category norm. The EasyCharge's standout feature is its excellent feedback handling, scoring a perfect 5.0/5—0.29 points above the category average of 4.71. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during everyday use. The device also offers convenient rechargeable batteries. Within the same budget price range, the RxEars Rxi achieves significantly stronger overall performance with a 4.09/5 SoundScore. Consumers prioritizing sound quality on a tight budget may find better value elsewhere, though the EasyCharge's feedback stability and rechargeable design could appeal to users with modest amplification needs who value convenience over maximum speech clarity.

Hero Image
ZeppSoundGrade B

Zepp Clarity Pixie

The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of OTC hearing aids tested. Speech clarity is a notable strength for the Pixie. It scores 3.6/5 for speech in quiet—a solid result that sits 0.77 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is above the category average as well, though at 1.7/5 it remains low in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. Music streaming is a particular weakness, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average. Those who frequently stream phone audio should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10 both score above 4.6/5 at similar prices. The Elehear Delight and Yeasound RIC700 deliver scores around 4.3/5 at lower price points. The Pixie may appeal to users who prioritize its discreet invisible-in-ear form factor and primarily need speech clarity in quieter environments, but those seeking well-rounded performance or music streaming should explore alternatives.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
EarCentric EasyCharge1.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie3.6
Speech in noiseNew
EarCentric EasyCharge1.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie1.7
Own voice
EarCentric EasyCharge1.9
Zepp Clarity Pixie1.5
Feedback handling
EarCentric EasyCharge5.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie4.3
Music streaming
EarCentric EasyCharge0.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie0.0
Overall fit score
EarCentric EasyCharge2.7
Zepp Clarity Pixie3.6

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Audio scenes

Using MUSHRA scenes (Tuned)

No sample
No sample

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

EarCentric EasyChargeZepp Clarity Pixie
Ear CouplingPower Dome with Slits
Ear CouplingPower Dome with Slits