EarCentric EasyCharge vs Orka Two
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

EarCentric EasyCharge
The EarCentric EasyCharge is a budget-priced prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2023, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. At $229, it sits at the entry level of the prescription hearing aid market. In our standardized testing, this device showed a significant performance gap compared to the prescription hearing aid category. Speech clarity scores were notably low, measuring 2.32 points below the category average in quiet environments and 0.96 points below average in noisy settings. Music streaming performance was similarly limited at 0.0/5, falling 2.64 points below average. Own-voice comfort scored 1.9/5, which is 0.85 points below the category norm. The EasyCharge's standout feature is its excellent feedback handling, scoring a perfect 5.0/5—0.29 points above the category average of 4.71. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during everyday use. The device also offers convenient rechargeable batteries. Within the same budget price range, the RxEars Rxi achieves significantly stronger overall performance with a 4.09/5 SoundScore. Consumers prioritizing sound quality on a tight budget may find better value elsewhere, though the EasyCharge's feedback stability and rechargeable design could appeal to users with modest amplification needs who value convenience over maximum speech clarity.
Choice

Orka Two
The Orka Two is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $1,899, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.0/5 in our lab testing. This places it in the top 67% of the 36 prescription hearing aids we've evaluated, ranking #25 in its category. In our testing, the Orka Two shows a mixed performance profile with clear strengths and weaknesses. Music streaming stands out at 3.3/5, measuring 0.66 points above the category average—a solid result for users who prioritize phone audio quality. Own-voice comfort also performs well at 3.2/5, sitting 0.45 points above average, which may contribute to a more natural listening experience. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, among the best we've measured. However, speech-in-noise performance is a notable limitation. At 1.4/5, it falls 0.56 points below the category average—a low absolute score that may affect understanding in challenging listening environments like restaurants or group conversations. Speech in quiet fares better at 3.7/5, measuring 0.40 points above average. The Orka Two may suit users who prioritize streaming quality, own-voice comfort, and stability over speech-in-noise performance. Those frequently in noisy environments should note that competitors in this price range, such as the Rexton Reach R-Li T80 at Costco (4.58/5), deliver stronger overall scores. Budget-conscious shoppers might also consider lower-priced alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10, which scored 4.19/5 in our testing.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Audio scenes
Using MUSHRA scenes (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit