Audien Atom Pro 2 vs Eargo 5

The Audien Atom Pro 2 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. Available for $289, this visible-in-ear device delivers solid performance in some areas while showing limitations in others. In our testing, the Atom Pro 2 demonstrated excellent feedback handling, scoring a perfect 5.0/5—0.46 points above the OTC category average. This means users can expect stable performance without whistling during typical daily activities. Own-voice comfort scored 2.6/5, slightly above the category average, suggesting acceptable naturalness when speaking. However, speech clarity presents a mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.3/5 (0.49 points below category average), and speech in noise scored a low 1.3/5 (0.16 points below average). The most significant limitation is music streaming, which scored 0.0/5—nearly 2 points below the category average—indicating this device is not suitable for those who want to stream audio from their phone. At this price point, several alternatives offer stronger overall performance, including the Elehear Beyond and Apple AirPods Pro 2. The Atom Pro 2 may suit budget-conscious consumers who prioritize feedback-free operation over streaming capabilities and don't need maximum speech clarity. Those seeking better speech performance or any music streaming should consider higher-scoring options in this price range.

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) featuring an invisible-in-ear design with rechargeable batteries. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 52% of the OTC hearing aid category. This device demonstrates solid performance for speech understanding in quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—0.75 points above the category average of 2.79/5. Own-voice comfort also measures above average at 2.8/5 (+0.29 vs category), though this remains mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.2/5, providing reliable stability during wear. However, the Eargo 5 shows notable limitations in other areas. Speech in noise performance is low at 1.4/5, slightly below the category average. Most significantly, music streaming scored 0.0/5, falling 1.92 points below the category average—this device does not support audio streaming functionality. The invisible-in-ear form factor appeals to users prioritizing discretion, and the closed sleeve coupling remains consistent between initial and tuned fits. Tuning provided modest improvement, moving from a normalized Initial Score of 3.5/5 to a Tuned Score of 3.7/5. Given its premium price point, consumers may want to compare against alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 or Nuance Audio Glasses, which offer similar or better sound performance at lower price points. The Eargo 5 is best suited for users who prioritize cosmetic discretion and primarily need help with speech in quieter settings.