Apple AirPods Pro 3 vs Eargo 8

The Apple AirPods Pro 3 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2025, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. At $250, it sits in the most affordable price tier of OTC devices, though its overall sound performance ranks #49 of 65 in the category. This device delivers standout performance in music streaming, scoring a strong 4.3/5—a full 2.38 points above the category average. Feedback handling is equally impressive at 5.0/5, meaning users can expect excellent stability without whistling or squealing during normal use. These strengths make the AirPods Pro 3 particularly appealing for users who prioritize media consumption alongside hearing assistance. However, speech clarity presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scores 2.3/5, falling 0.53 points below the category average. Speech in noise measures 1.8/5, which is above the category average but still low in absolute terms. Own-voice comfort also trails at 1.9/5, sitting 0.61 points below typical OTC performance. The AirPods Pro 3 is best suited for users already invested in the Apple ecosystem who want hearing assistance combined with premium streaming quality. Those prioritizing speech understanding in conversations may want to explore alternatives like the Apple AirPods Pro 2, which scores higher overall at a lower listed price, or the Elehear Beyond at the top of this price range.

The Eargo 8 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design with rechargeable batteries, priced at $2,399. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.4/5, placing it in the top 71% of the OTC Hearing Aid category. Sound performance presents a mixed picture. The Eargo 8 delivers solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.1/5, scoring 0.27 points above the category average—making it a reasonable choice for conversational settings without background noise. Own-voice comfort is another strength, measuring 0.69 points above average at 3.2/5, which may appeal to users who are sensitive to hearing their own voice through hearing aids. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average. However, the device shows notable weaknesses in challenging listening environments. Speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.2/5, falling 0.27 points below the category average—users who frequently encounter noisy restaurants, busy offices, or social gatherings may find this limiting. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, significantly below the category average, making this device unsuitable for users who prioritize audio entertainment through their hearing aids. The Eargo 8 is best suited for users who prioritize discreet, invisible-in-ear styling and primarily need assistance in quieter conversational settings. However, at this premium price point, buyers should be aware that similarly-priced alternatives and even some lower-cost options may offer comparable or better overall sound performance.