Sontro Soundwave vs Zepp Clarity Pixie
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Sontro Soundwave
The Sontro Soundwave is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.0/5 in our lab testing. At $849, this behind-the-ear device uses disposable batteries and sits in the lower tier of OTC performance, ranking #61 of 65 devices in its category. The Soundwave's strongest attribute is own-voice comfort, scoring 3.6/5—a solid result that sits 1.09 points above the OTC category average. This makes it relatively comfortable for wearers who are sensitive to hearing their own voice sound unnatural or boomy. However, other performance areas present significant limitations. Speech clarity scores are below average in both quiet and noisy environments. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5 (0.12 points below average), while speech in noise drops to 1.2/5 (0.28 points below average). Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 2.5/5, falling 2.04 points below the category average of 4.54/5. Perhaps most limiting is the music streaming score of 0.0/5, indicating this device does not support phone audio streaming—a feature many competitors in this price range offer. Consumers prioritizing own-voice comfort on a moderate budget may find the Soundwave acceptable, but those seeking strong speech clarity or streaming capability should consider alternatives. Several higher-performing OTC devices are available at similar or lower price points, including options like the Lexie Lumen or HearingAssist Control that deliver comparable or better overall sound quality.

Zepp Clarity Pixie
The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of the OTC hearing aid category. This device delivers solid speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 3.6/5—notably 0.77 points above the category average. Speech understanding in noisy settings scores 1.7/5, which is above the category average but low in absolute terms, indicating modest benefit when background noise is present. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in certain areas. Own-voice comfort scores 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average, which may result in a noticeable hollow or boomy quality to your own voice. Music streaming capability is essentially absent, scoring 0.0/5—nearly 2 points below average—making this device unsuitable for those who prioritize streaming audio quality. The invisible-in-ear form factor offers excellent discretion, and the device includes rechargeable batteries with both iPhone and Android streaming connectivity. However, shoppers in this price range should note that several competitors offer substantially higher sound performance. The Zepp Clarity Pixie may appeal to those prioritizing an ultra-discreet design and strong speech clarity in quiet settings, but listeners who value streaming music or need better noise management may find better options elsewhere in this price tier.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit