Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX vs Yeasound RIC800
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.5
Yeasound RIC8004.1
Speech in noise
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX2.6
Yeasound RIC8002.1
Own voice
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX1.5
Yeasound RIC8002.1
Feedback handling
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.3
Yeasound RIC8005.0
Music streaming
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX0.0
Yeasound RIC8004.3
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
Signia Silk Charge&Go IXYeasound RIC800
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Ear CouplingClosed Vented Dome
Receiver–
ReceiverMedium-power
Fitting Formula–
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Listening Program–
Listening ProgramAdaptive
Volume Setting–
Volume Setting60% volume
Software Version–
Software VersionFirmware v158.1.0.50
Tuning Adjustments–
Tuning AdjustmentsHearing Type at "High-frequency Sound Enhancement", Other settings at manufacturer default
Notes–
NotesTuned and Initial Fittings identical as further adjustments did not improve fitting.