Resound Vivia 9 60S microRIE vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX

The Resound Vivia 9 60S microRIE is a premium prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2025, currently available at $3,798. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.9/5, ranking #27 of 36 prescription hearing aids tested. This device demonstrates a mixed performance profile in our testing. Own-voice comfort is a notable strength, scoring 3.4/5—a solid result that sits 0.65 points above the category average, which may appeal to users sensitive to the hollow or boomy sound of their own speech. Speech clarity in quiet environments also performs well at 3.4/5, slightly above the category average. However, the Vivia 9 shows significant limitations in challenging listening situations. Speech in noise scored just 1.1/5, falling 0.81 points below the prescription hearing aid average—a substantial gap that suggests difficulty in restaurants, group conversations, or other noisy environments. Feedback handling, while strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, still lands 0.51 points below what we typically see from prescription devices. Music streaming quality is mixed at 2.6/5, essentially matching the category average. At this premium price point, the Vivia 9 faces stiff competition. Several same-priced alternatives, including the Phonak Sphere Infinio and Oticon Intent, achieved notably higher overall scores in our testing. Consumers prioritizing noise performance may want to explore these options or consider lower-priced alternatives like the Sennheiser All Day Clear that delivered stronger overall results in our lab.

The Signia Silk Charge&Go IX is a premium-priced invisible-in-ear prescription hearing aid currently available at $3,298. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.7/5, ranking #30 of 36 prescription hearing aids tested. This device delivers excellent speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 4.6/5—a full 1.30 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is mixed at 2.2/5, though still slightly above average for the category. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, providing reliable stability during daily wear. The Silk Charge&Go IX has notable limitations. Own-voice comfort scores low at 1.5/5, falling 1.25 points below the category average—a consideration for users sensitive to how their own voice sounds while wearing hearing aids. Most significantly, the device scored 0.0/5 for music streaming, meaning it lacks practical streaming capability from phones or other devices. At this price point, competitors like the Phonak Sphere Infinio (5.0/5), Oticon Intent (4.85/5), and Signia's own Active Pro IX (4.67/5) deliver substantially higher overall sound performance. The Silk Charge&Go IX may appeal to users who prioritize an invisible form factor and strong speech clarity in quiet settings, but those who value music streaming or own-voice comfort should explore alternatives.