Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Otofonix Groove vs Zepp Clarity Pixie

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Otofonix Groove Hero
OtofonixSoundGrade C

Otofonix Groove

The Otofonix Groove is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $795, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. This rechargeable BTE device ranks 36th out of 36 tested prescription hearing aids, placing it in the bottom tier of its category. In our testing, the Groove demonstrated one clear strength: excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, scoring 0.29 points above the category average. The device remained stable during our standardized challenge motions with no audible feedback issues. However, speech performance was significantly limited, with both speech in quiet and speech in noise scoring 1.0/5—falling 2.32 and 0.96 points below their respective category averages. Music streaming quality scored 0.0/5, which is 2.64 points below the prescription category average. Own-voice comfort was also low at 0.4/5 in the tuned configuration, 2.35 points below average, suggesting notable occlusion-related concerns. The normalized Initial Score of 2.7/5 and Tuned Score of 2.6/5 indicate that professional fitting adjustments did not improve overall performance. Given its positioning at the bottom of the prescription hearing aid category and the availability of lower-priced alternatives that scored higher in our testing, the Otofonix Groove may be difficult to recommend for most users seeking balanced sound quality across listening situations.

Hero Image
ZeppSoundGrade B

Zepp Clarity Pixie

The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of OTC hearing aids tested. Speech clarity is a notable strength for the Pixie. It scores 3.6/5 for speech in quiet—a solid result that sits 0.77 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is above the category average as well, though at 1.7/5 it remains low in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. Music streaming is a particular weakness, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average. Those who frequently stream phone audio should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10 both score above 4.6/5 at similar prices. The Elehear Delight and Yeasound RIC700 deliver scores around 4.3/5 at lower price points. The Pixie may appeal to users who prioritize its discreet invisible-in-ear form factor and primarily need speech clarity in quieter environments, but those seeking well-rounded performance or music streaming should explore alternatives.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Otofonix Groove1.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie3.6
Speech in noiseNew
Otofonix Groove1.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie1.7
Own voice
Otofonix Groove0.4
Zepp Clarity Pixie1.5
Feedback handling
Otofonix Groove5.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie4.3
Music streaming
Otofonix Groove0.0
Zepp Clarity Pixie0.0
Overall fit score
Otofonix Groove2.6
Zepp Clarity Pixie3.6

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Audio scenes

Using MUSHRA scenes (Tuned)

No sample
No sample

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Otofonix GrooveZepp Clarity Pixie
Ear CouplingClosed Dome
Ear CouplingPower Dome with Slits