Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
Oticon Intent vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Expert
Choice
Choice
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
Oticon Intent4.6
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.5
Speech in noise
Oticon Intent3.7
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX2.6
Own voice
Oticon Intent1.3
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX1.5
Feedback handling
Oticon Intent5.0
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.3
Music streaming
Oticon Intent4.0
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX0.0
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
Oticon IntentSignia Silk Charge&Go IX
Ear CouplingPower Dome
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Receiver85
Receiver–
Fitting FormulaVAC+ (Manufacturer proprietary targets)
Fitting Formula–
Listening ProgramGeneral (Automatic)
Listening Program–
Volume SettingAdjusted to match NAL-NL2 targets at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL
Volume Setting–
Software VersionFirmware v1.0.0
Software Version–
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram, Feedback calibrated, Acclimatization at 3/3, Other settings at manufacturer defaults
Tuning Adjustments–
Notesn/a
Notes–