Oticon Intent vs Signia Pure Charge&Go MaX

The Oticon Intent is a premium behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid released in 2024, priced at $4,898 and earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.8/5 in our lab testing. This places it at #4 among 39 prescription hearing aids tested, within the top 8% of its category. In our testing, the Intent demonstrates notable strengths in speech performance, scoring 0.54 points above the category average for speech in quiet and a substantial 0.95 points above average for speech in noise. Music streaming is a particular highlight, measuring 1.24 points above the category average with a strong 4.0/5 score. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, slightly exceeding the already-high category average. The primary limitation revealed in our testing is own-voice comfort, which scores 1.3/5—a low absolute score that falls 1.40 points below the category average. Users sensitive to the sound of their own voice may find this characteristic noticeable. This is a common trade-off in devices optimized for speech audibility. The Oticon Intent is well-suited for users prioritizing speech understanding across varied listening environments and high-quality audio streaming. It has earned HearAdvisor's Expert's Choice Award in both 2023 and 2024. Shoppers in this premium price tier may also consider the Phonak Sphere Infinio (#2) or the lower-priced Oticon Zeal, which offers strong performance at a reduced cost.

The Signia Pure Charge&Go MaX is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid released in 2026 that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.3/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This strong overall performance reflects solid results across key listening scenarios, with particular strengths in own-voice comfort and speech understanding in noisy environments. In our testing, the Pure Charge&Go MaX demonstrated notable advantages over the prescription hearing aid category average. Own-voice comfort scored 1.00 points above the category average at 3.7/5, suggesting effective management of occlusion-related issues that many hearing aid users find bothersome. Speech in noise performance measured 0.65 points above average at 2.8/5—above the category average, but only mixed in absolute terms, indicating room for improvement in the most challenging listening situations. Speech in quiet scored a solid 3.6/5, landing 0.24 points above the category average. Music streaming measured 2.9/5, slightly above average but mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling scored an excellent 4.6/5 in absolute terms, though this fell 0.12 points below the category average of 4.72/5, reflecting the generally strong feedback control across modern prescription devices. The device showed meaningful improvement from initial to tuned fitting, with the normalized score rising from 4.2/5 to 4.6/5 after professional adjustment. This suggests that working with a hearing care professional to optimize settings can unlock additional performance, particularly for speech understanding. The Pure Charge&Go MaX appears well-suited for users who prioritize natural own-voice quality and improved conversation clarity in moderately noisy settings.