Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) vs Sontro Soundwave

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.

The Sontro Soundwave is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid priced at $849, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This behind-the-ear device uses disposable batteries and ranks #61 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 92% of its category. In our lab testing, the Soundwave shows a notable strength in own-voice comfort, scoring 3.6/5—a solid result that sits 1.09 points above the category average. This suggests users may experience less of the "talking in a barrel" sensation that can occur with some hearing aids. However, the device faces challenges in other key areas. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5 (mixed, 0.12 points below average), while speech in noise registers at 1.2/5 (low, 0.28 points below average), indicating potential difficulty in challenging listening environments. The most significant limitations appear in music streaming and feedback handling. Music streaming scores 0.0/5, falling 1.92 points below the category average—a notable weakness for users who value audio entertainment. Feedback handling scores 2.5/5, which is 2.04 points below the category average of 4.54/5, suggesting the device may be more prone to whistling issues. At this price point, competitors offer substantially stronger performance. Devices like the Sony CRE-E10 and Lexie B2 Plus deliver significantly higher sound scores in the same price range. The Sontro Soundwave may suit those prioritizing own-voice comfort over speech clarity and streaming quality, but most users would benefit from exploring higher-performing alternatives at similar or lower prices.