Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) vs Resound Vivia 9 60S microRIE

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.

The Resound Vivia 9 60S microRIE is a premium prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2025, currently available at $3,798. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.9/5, ranking #27 of 36 prescription hearing aids tested. This device demonstrates a mixed performance profile in our testing. Own-voice comfort is a notable strength, scoring 3.4/5—a solid result that sits 0.65 points above the category average, which may appeal to users sensitive to the hollow or boomy sound of their own speech. Speech clarity in quiet environments also performs well at 3.4/5, slightly above the category average. However, the Vivia 9 shows significant limitations in challenging listening situations. Speech in noise scored just 1.1/5, falling 0.81 points below the prescription hearing aid average—a substantial gap that suggests difficulty in restaurants, group conversations, or other noisy environments. Feedback handling, while strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, still lands 0.51 points below what we typically see from prescription devices. Music streaming quality is mixed at 2.6/5, essentially matching the category average. At this premium price point, the Vivia 9 faces stiff competition. Several same-priced alternatives, including the Phonak Sphere Infinio and Oticon Intent, achieved notably higher overall scores in our testing. Consumers prioritizing noise performance may want to explore these options or consider lower-priced alternatives like the Sennheiser All Day Clear that delivered stronger overall results in our lab.