Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) vs RCA Micro
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.

RCA Micro
The RCA Micro is a budget-priced behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid released in 2023, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. At $399, it sits in the lowest price tier of the OTC category but ranks last among the 65 OTC hearing aids we've tested. In our standardized testing, the RCA Micro shows a significant performance gap compared to category peers. Speech understanding scores are notably low, with speech in quiet at 1.0/5 (1.79 points below the category average) and speech in noise also at 1.0/5 (0.48 points below average). Music streaming scored 0.0/5, falling 1.92 points below the category average—meaning phone audio streaming is essentially non-functional as a feature. The one bright spot is excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, which is 0.46 points above the category average, indicating stable performance without whistling during normal use. Own-voice comfort is mixed at 2.1/5, sitting 0.41 points below the category average. This suggests wearers may notice some unnatural quality to their own voice during conversations. At this price point, several alternatives deliver substantially stronger performance. The Elehear Beyond, Apple AirPods Pro 2, and Zepp Clarity Omni all fall within the same price range while scoring significantly higher in our testing. The RCA Micro's rechargeable batteries and simple BTE design offer basic convenience, but consumers seeking meaningful speech clarity improvements should consider higher-performing options in this competitive budget segment.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit