Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) vs Otofonix Elite
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product in the hearing glasses style, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $375, this device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, this product demonstrated exceptional strengths in music streaming quality, scoring 4.3/5—a remarkable 3.14 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort was equally impressive at 4.7/5, exceeding the category average by over 2 points. These results suggest Meta has prioritized the audio experience that their glasses are known for, delivering strong fidelity for streamed content and minimal occlusion-related discomfort. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.7/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise measured 1.6/5—still above average for the category, but low overall. The most notable weakness is feedback handling at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) are best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and comfort over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking amplification primarily for challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech-in-noise performance.

Otofonix Elite
The Otofonix Elite is a behind-the-ear amplification product priced at $249, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.6/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. Released in 2016, this budget amplifier ranks #8 of 8 devices in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, the Elite demonstrates one clear strength: excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, which is 0.72 points above the category average. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during normal use. However, other performance metrics tell a different story. Speech clarity is a significant weakness. Speech in quiet scores just 1.0/5, which is 1.11 points below the category average, while speech in noise also scores 1.0/5, falling 0.37 points below average. Own-voice comfort is particularly low at 0.1/5 in the tuned configuration—2.54 points below the category average—meaning users may find their own voice sounds boomy or unnatural. Music streaming is not supported, scoring 0.0/5. At this price point, consumers should note that alternatives like the Audien Hearing Atom offer better sound performance at a lower price. The Otofonix Elite may appeal to those prioritizing feedback-free operation above all else, but its limited speech benefit and comfort challenges make it difficult to recommend for most users seeking improved hearing clarity.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Audio scenes
Recorded samples (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit