Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) vs Otofonix Elite
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)
The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.

Otofonix Elite
The Otofonix Elite is a behind-the-ear amplification product priced at $249, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.6/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. Released in 2016, this budget amplifier ranks #8 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our lab testing, the Elite demonstrates one clear strength: excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, which is 0.72 points above the category average. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during normal use. However, the device shows significant limitations in other areas. Speech performance is notably limited, with speech in quiet scoring 1.0/5 (1.11 points below category average) and speech in noise also at 1.0/5 (0.37 points below average). The device does not support Bluetooth streaming, resulting in a 0.0/5 music streaming score. Own-voice comfort is particularly low at 0.1/5, falling 2.54 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. At this price point, consumers may want to consider alternatives that offer better overall performance. Several devices with higher SoundScores are available at lower prices, including the Audien Hearing Atom (3.31/5) and HSKLock Hearing Aid (3.00/5). The Otofonix Elite may appeal to those prioritizing feedback-free operation above all else, but its limited speech clarity and lack of streaming make it difficult to recommend for general use.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Audio scenes
Using MUSHRA scenes (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit