Jabra Enhance Select M3 vs RCA In-Ear

The Jabra Enhance Select M3 is a premium OTC hearing aid priced at $1,995, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.0/5 in our lab testing. This behind-the-ear device delivers strong overall performance, positioning it among the better-performing options in the OTC category. In our testing, the Enhance Select M3 showed notable strengths in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 3.8/5—a solid result that sits 0.95 points above the OTC category average. Music streaming quality also performs well at 2.8/5, which is 0.87 points above average for the category, though still mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.6/5, ensuring stable performance during movement and daily activities. The device does show limitations in challenging listening environments. Speech in noise scored 1.3/5, which falls 0.18 points below the category average and represents a low absolute score. Users who frequently encounter noisy restaurants, busy social gatherings, or similar environments may find this a meaningful limitation. Own-voice comfort scored 2.7/5—above the category average by 0.18 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Consumers seeking strong performance in quieter settings with good music streaming capability may find the Enhance Select M3 appealing. However, shoppers should note that alternatives like the Sennheiser All Day Clear and Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco offer comparable or higher scores at lower price points, potentially representing better overall value for budget-conscious buyers.

The RCA In-Ear is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid available for $249, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.8/5 in our lab testing. This places it near the bottom of the OTC hearing aid category, ranking 64th out of 65 devices tested. In our standardized testing, the RCA In-Ear shows a mixed performance profile. Its standout strength is excellent feedback handling, scoring a perfect 5.0/5—0.46 points above the category average. This means users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during normal wear. Own-voice comfort scores 2.6/5, which is essentially at the category average (+0.09 points), offering mixed but acceptable performance for how your own voice sounds while wearing the devices. However, the core speech performance metrics present significant limitations. Speech in quiet scores just 1.0/5, falling 1.79 points below the category average, and speech in noise also scores 1.0/5, sitting 0.48 points below average. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, indicating this device is not suitable for audio entertainment purposes. At this price point, buyers have considerably stronger options. Competitors like the Lucid Enrich Pro and JLab Hear OTC offer better sound performance at lower prices. The RCA In-Ear may appeal to those prioritizing feedback-free wear above speech clarity, but most users seeking meaningful hearing benefit should consider higher-performing alternatives in this budget segment.