Jabra Enhance Select 500 vs Zepp Clarity Pixie
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Choice

Jabra Enhance Select 500
The Jabra Enhance Select 500 is a premium behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid priced at $1,995 that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.2/5 in our lab testing. Ranking #13 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, it places in the top 18% of its category. This 2024 release demonstrates strong speech-in-quiet performance, scoring 4.3/5—a full 1.50 points above the OTC category average. Speech-in-noise scores 1.8/5, which is above the category average by 0.31 points but remains low in absolute terms, reflecting a common challenge across OTC devices. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.6/5, slightly above the already-high category average. Music streaming scores 2.9/5, which is 0.98 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms—adequate for casual listening but not audiophile-quality. Own-voice comfort at 2.2/5 falls 0.31 points below the category average, which may be noticeable for users sensitive to how their voice sounds. The Enhance Select 500 supports iPhone and Android streaming, hands-free calling, and uses rechargeable batteries. It's a solid choice for those prioritizing clear speech in quieter environments and reliable feedback control. However, buyers seeking better value might consider the Jabra Enhance Select 300 or Lucid Engage, which offer similar sound performance at lower price points. This model has earned HearAdvisor's Expert's Choice Award in both 2023 and 2024.

Zepp Clarity Pixie
The Zepp Clarity Pixie is a mid-priced OTC hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, priced at $999. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 48% of OTC hearing aids tested. Speech clarity is a notable strength for the Pixie. It scores 3.6/5 for speech in quiet—a solid result that sits 0.77 points above the category average. Speech in noise performance is above the category average as well, though at 1.7/5 it remains low in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The Pixie shows significant limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores just 1.5/5, falling 1.01 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds unnatural or boomy. Music streaming is a particular weakness, scoring 0.0/5, which is 1.92 points below the category average. Those who frequently stream phone audio should consider alternatives. At this price point, competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Yeasound RIC800 and Sony CRE-E10 both score above 4.6/5 at similar prices. The Elehear Delight and Yeasound RIC700 deliver scores around 4.3/5 at lower price points. The Pixie may appeal to users who prioritize its discreet invisible-in-ear form factor and primarily need speech clarity in quieter environments, but those seeking well-rounded performance or music streaming should explore alternatives.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit