Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison

Elehear Beyond Pro vs Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Expert Choice
Expert
Choice
Elehear Beyond Pro Hero
ElehearSoundGrade A

Elehear Beyond Pro

HearAdvisor lab-tested performance overview.

Expert Choice
Expert
Choice
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco Hero
JabraSoundGrade A

Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco

HearAdvisor lab-tested performance overview.

We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Speech in quiet
Elehear Beyond Pro4.3
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco3.9
Speech in noise
Elehear Beyond Pro3.6
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco1.3
Own voice
Elehear Beyond Pro1.2
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco3.5
Feedback handling
Elehear Beyond Pro5.0
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco4.8
Music streaming
Elehear Beyond Pro3.8
Jabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco2.8

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Elehear Beyond ProJabra Enhance Pro 20 at Costco
Ear CouplingClosed Dome
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
ReceiverMedium-power
ReceiverMedium-power
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting FormulaAudiogram+ (Manufacturer proprietary targets)
Listening ProgramRestaurant
Listening ProgramUniversal (Automatic)
Volume Setting58% (11/19 volume)
Volume SettingAdjusted to match NAL-NL2 targets at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL
Software VersionSoftware v3.3.1(14.48), Firmware v0.0.9
Software VersionFirmware v9.18.12, Software v2.0.132.26
Tuning AdjustmentsNoise Control at "Adaptive", Other settings at manufacturer defaults
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram, Experience Level set at "Experienced User Non-Linear", Other settings at manufacturer defaults
NotesTuned and Initial Fittings identical as further adjustments did not improve fitting.
Notesn/a