Eargo 8 vs Oticon Zeal

The Eargo 8 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,399) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device represents Eargo's 2025 flagship offering, featuring a rechargeable design that sits completely within the ear canal. In our testing, the Eargo 8 showed mixed performance across key metrics. Speech clarity in quiet environments is a relative strength, scoring 0.27 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also performs well, measuring 0.69 points above average at 3.2/5—a solid result that suggests reduced occlusion effects during conversation. However, speech understanding in noisy environments scored 1.2/5, which is both low in absolute terms and 0.27 points below the category average. The most significant limitation we measured was music streaming, which scored 0.0/5—nearly 2 points below the OTC average. This makes the Eargo 8 unsuitable for users who prioritize streaming audio quality. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average. At its premium price point, the Eargo 8 faces stiff competition. Several devices in our database deliver comparable or better sound performance at lower prices, including alternatives from Eargo's own lineup. The Eargo 8 is best suited for users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and own-voice comfort over streaming capability and value, and who primarily need help hearing speech in quieter settings.

The Oticon Zeal is a premium prescription hearing aid in the invisible-in-ear style, carrying an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.7/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $4,798, it ranks #6 among 39 prescription hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 13% of its category. Speech performance is where the Zeal truly excels. Our testing measured an excellent 4.9/5 for speech in quiet—1.48 points above the category average—making it one of the strongest performers for everyday conversations. Speech in noise also scores a solid 3.0/5, sitting 0.93 points above the category average of 2.11/5, indicating reliable performance in moderately challenging listening environments. Music streaming quality registers at a solid 3.3/5, which is 0.54 points above the category average. However, the Zeal shows some limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort scores a mixed 2.0/5, falling 0.70 points below the category average—something to consider if own-voice naturalness is a priority. Feedback handling measures at 3.3/5, which is solid in absolute terms but sits 1.42 points below the category average of 4.72/5. The Oticon Zeal is best suited for wearers who prioritize exceptional speech clarity and want a discreet, invisible-in-ear form factor. Those especially sensitive to feedback or own-voice effects may want to discuss these trade-offs with their hearing care provider during fitting.