Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Eargo 6 vs Otofonix Groove

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Eargo 6 Hero
EargoSoundScore 3.4Grade B

Eargo 6

The Eargo 6 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,250) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.4/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device ranks #42 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 63% of its category. In our standardized testing, the Eargo 6 demonstrates solid speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 3.3/5—notably 0.53 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also performs above category average at 2.9/5, which may benefit users sensitive to the sound of their own voice. However, the device shows limitations in challenging listening situations, with speech-in-noise performance scoring 1.0/5, falling 0.48 points below the category average. A significant limitation is music streaming, which scores 0.0/5—well below the category average by 1.92 points. Users who prioritize streaming audio content should consider alternatives. Feedback handling scores 3.3/5, which is solid in absolute terms though 1.24 points below the category average of 4.54/5. The Eargo 6 may appeal to users prioritizing a completely invisible form factor and solid quiet-environment performance. However, at its premium price point, alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 offer stronger overall performance at a lower price. The rechargeable battery adds convenience, but buyers should weigh the device's limitations in noise and streaming against its aesthetic benefits.

Otofonix Groove Hero
OtofonixSoundScore 2.7Grade C

Otofonix Groove

The Otofonix Groove is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $795, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in our lab testing. This rechargeable BTE ranks #38 of 39 devices in the prescription hearing aid category, placing it in the bottom 5% of its class. In our testing, the Groove demonstrated excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, scoring 0.28 points above the category average. This represents a genuine strength, with the device maintaining stability during our standardized challenge motions. However, speech performance was significantly limited, with speech in quiet scoring 1.0/5 (2.40 points below the category average of 3.40) and speech in noise also at 1.0/5 (1.11 points below average). Music streaming was not functional in our tests, scoring 0.0/5 against a category average of 2.76. Own-voice comfort also fell well below typical prescription hearing aid performance at 0.4/5, which is 2.30 points below the category average. At this price point, several lower-cost alternatives delivered stronger overall performance in our testing. Consumers seeking value in the prescription category may want to explore other options, though those requiring robust feedback control in a rechargeable BTE format may find the Groove's stability noteworthy despite its other limitations.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Eargo 63.3
Otofonix Groove1.0
Speech in noiseNew
Eargo 61.0
Otofonix Groove1.0
Own voice
Eargo 62.9
Otofonix Groove0.4
Feedback handling
Eargo 63.3
Otofonix Groove5.0
Music streaming
Eargo 60.0
Otofonix Groove0.0
Overall fit score
Eargo 63.4
Otofonix Groove2.5

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Audio scenes

Recorded samples (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Eargo 6Otofonix Groove
Ear CouplingSleeve Closed
Ear CouplingClosed Dome