Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Eargo 6 vs Linner Mars

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Eargo 6 Hero
EargoSoundGrade B

Eargo 6

The Eargo 6 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,250) that earned a B grade and a SoundScore of 3.4/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 63% of OTC hearing aids we've evaluated. This invisible-in-ear device delivers solid speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 3.3/5—notably 0.53 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort is also above average at 2.9/5, though mixed in absolute terms. However, the Eargo 6 shows significant weaknesses in challenging listening situations, with speech-in-noise performance scoring just 1.0/5, falling 0.48 points below the category average. The most notable limitation is music streaming, which scored 0.0/5 in our testing—substantially below the category average. Feedback handling scored 3.3/5, solid in absolute terms but 1.24 points below the OTC average of 4.54/5. The device uses rechargeable batteries and maintains a fully invisible profile when worn. The Eargo 6 may suit consumers who prioritize discreet aesthetics and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, shoppers should note that alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 and Olive Union Air achieved higher SoundScores at lower price points. Those frequently in noisy environments or who value music streaming should explore other options.

Linner Mars Hero
LinnerSoundGrade B

Linner Mars

The Linner Mars is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid released in 2023, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.2/5 in our lab testing. At $399, it falls in the lower price tier of the OTC category but ranks #55 of 65 OTC devices tested, placing it in the bottom 17% of its category. This visible-in-ear device presents a mixed performance profile with notable strengths and significant weaknesses. Music streaming is a standout feature, scoring an excellent 4.6/5—a full 2.68 points above the category average. Feedback handling is also excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users can expect stable performance without whistling during normal use. However, speech clarity presents challenges. Speech in quiet scores a low 1.9/5, falling 0.85 points below the category average. Speech in noise performance is particularly limited at 1.0/5, sitting 0.46 points below average. Own-voice comfort also scores low at 1.0/5, which is 1.51 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounding unnatural or boomy. The Linner Mars may suit budget-conscious consumers who prioritize music and media streaming over speech understanding in challenging environments. However, buyers seeking better speech performance should consider alternatives like the Elehear Beyond or Apple AirPods Pro 2, which offer stronger overall sound scores in the same price range.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Eargo 63.3
Linner Mars1.9
Speech in noiseNew
Eargo 61.0
Linner Mars1.0
Own voice
Eargo 62.9
Linner Mars1.0
Feedback handling
Eargo 63.3
Linner Mars5.0
Music streaming
Eargo 60.0
Linner Mars4.6
Overall fit score
Eargo 63.4
Linner Mars3.4

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Eargo 6Linner Mars
Ear CouplingSleeve Closed
Ear CouplingClosed Dome