Back to Comparisons
Product Comparison

Eargo 6 vs HearingAssist Micro

Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.

Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
Eargo 6 Hero
EargoSoundGrade B

Eargo 6

The Eargo 6 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($2,250) that earned a B grade and a SoundScore of 3.4/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 63% of OTC hearing aids we've evaluated. This invisible-in-ear device delivers solid speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 3.3/5—notably 0.53 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort is also above average at 2.9/5, though mixed in absolute terms. However, the Eargo 6 shows significant weaknesses in challenging listening situations, with speech-in-noise performance scoring just 1.0/5, falling 0.48 points below the category average. The most notable limitation is music streaming, which scored 0.0/5 in our testing—substantially below the category average. Feedback handling scored 3.3/5, solid in absolute terms but 1.24 points below the OTC average of 4.54/5. The device uses rechargeable batteries and maintains a fully invisible profile when worn. The Eargo 6 may suit consumers who prioritize discreet aesthetics and primarily need help hearing conversations in quieter settings. However, shoppers should note that alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 and Olive Union Air achieved higher SoundScores at lower price points. Those frequently in noisy environments or who value music streaming should explore other options.

HearingAssist Micro Hero
HearingAssistSoundGrade B

HearingAssist Micro

The HearingAssist Micro is a premium amplifier in the invisible-in-ear style, priced at $698. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it #3 among the 8 amplification products we've tested. This device shows a clear strength in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—a solid result that sits 1.35 points above the category average of 2.11/5. Feedback handling is also strong at 4.0/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.28/5. Own-voice comfort comes in at 2.8/5, which is above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. The Micro has notable limitations. Speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.1/5, falling 0.31 points below the category average. Music streaming is where this device struggles most significantly, scoring 0.0/5—well below the already modest category average of 1.16/5. Users who want to stream audio from their phone should look elsewhere. The HearingAssist Micro may suit those prioritizing discreet, invisible-in-ear design and clear speech understanding in quieter settings. However, buyers seeking strong noise management or any music streaming capability should consider alternatives. At this price point, the Sennheiser Conversation Clear Plus offers notably higher overall performance, while options like the iHear MatriX deliver similar sound quality at a lower price.

Performance metrics

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Lab metric by fit

Scale 1-5 (Tuned)

Speech in quietNew
Eargo 63.3
HearingAssist Micro3.5
Speech in noiseNew
Eargo 61.0
HearingAssist Micro1.1
Own voice
Eargo 62.9
HearingAssist Micro2.8
Feedback handling
Eargo 63.3
HearingAssist Micro4.0
Music streaming
Eargo 60.0
HearingAssist Micro0.0
Overall fit score
Eargo 63.4
HearingAssist Micro3.5

Speech level

Adjust input dB (Tuned)

Amplification (REIG)

Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)

Fitting configuration for tuned fit

Eargo 6HearingAssist Micro
Ear CouplingSleeve Closed
Ear CouplingOpen Dome