Eargo 5 vs Oticon Zeal

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device offers a discreet rechargeable design, though its acoustic performance shows notable strengths and weaknesses compared to alternatives in its price range. In our testing, the Eargo 5 demonstrates solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.5/5, scoring 0.75 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also measures above average, which may appeal to users sensitive to occlusion effects. However, speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.4/5, and music streaming scores 0.0/5—significantly below the category average of 1.92/5. Users who prioritize phone streaming or frequently encounter noisy environments should consider these limitations. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The device uses closed sleeves for ear coupling in both initial and tuned configurations, with minimal score improvement from tuning (3.6 to 3.7/5). At this price point, competitors like the Lucid Tala (4.63/5) and Audicus Omni 2 (4.61/5) offer substantially higher overall sound performance. Budget-conscious shoppers may also find similar or better sound quality from lower-priced options like the Sony CRE-C10. The Eargo 5 may suit users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and quiet-environment listening over streaming and noise performance.

The Oticon Zeal is a premium invisible-in-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $4,798. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.7/5, placing it in the top 11% of prescription hearing aids tested and ranking #5 of 36 devices in its category. Speech performance is where the Zeal truly excels. It achieved an excellent 4.9/5 in speech-in-quiet testing, scoring 1.56 points above the category average—among the strongest results we've measured. Speech-in-noise performance is solid at 3.0/5, which is 1.08 points above the category average of 1.96/5, making it notably better than typical prescription aids in challenging listening environments. Music streaming quality scores 3.3/5, sitting 0.66 points above category average and providing solid fidelity for phone audio. However, the Zeal shows some limitations in other areas. Own-voice comfort is mixed at 2.0/5, falling 0.75 points below the category average—users sensitive to how their own voice sounds may notice this. Feedback handling, while solid in absolute terms at 3.3/5, measures 1.41 points below the category average of 4.71/5. The Zeal is best suited for users who prioritize outstanding speech clarity in both quiet and moderately noisy settings, and who value quality audio streaming. Those particularly sensitive to own-voice perception or who need maximum feedback stability may want to discuss these tradeoffs with their hearing care provider.