EarCentric EX2 vs Signia Pure Charge&Go MaX

The EarCentric EX2 is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $218, positioning it as a budget-friendly option in the prescription category. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5, ranking #35 of 39 prescription hearing aids tested. This 2021 release demonstrates mixed performance across key metrics. Its standout strength is feedback handling, scoring an excellent 4.7/5—essentially matching the category average and indicating reliable stability during movement. However, speech performance is a significant weakness: speech in quiet scores just 1.0/5 (2.40 points below the category average of 3.40), and speech in noise scores 1.0/5 (1.11 points below average). These low absolute scores suggest limited audibility enhancement in our standardized test conditions. Own-voice comfort scores 2.3/5, which is mixed in absolute terms and 0.40 points below the category average. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, indicating this device is not suited for audio entertainment purposes. The EarCentric EX2 may appeal to budget-conscious consumers who prioritize cost over performance, but alternatives exist at similar or lower price points with stronger test results. The RxEars Rxi, available in the same price range, scored 4.07/5 in our testing. Consumers seeking entry-level amplification should weigh the significant speech clarity limitations against the low purchase price.

The Signia Pure Charge&Go MaX is a behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid released in 2026 that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.3/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This strong overall performance reflects solid results across key listening scenarios, with particular strengths in own-voice comfort and speech understanding in noisy environments. In our testing, the Pure Charge&Go MaX demonstrated notable advantages over the prescription hearing aid category average. Own-voice comfort scored 1.00 points above the category average at 3.7/5, suggesting effective management of occlusion-related issues that many hearing aid users find bothersome. Speech in noise performance measured 0.65 points above average at 2.8/5—above the category average, but only mixed in absolute terms, indicating room for improvement in the most challenging listening situations. Speech in quiet scored a solid 3.6/5, landing 0.24 points above the category average. Music streaming measured 2.9/5, slightly above average but mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling scored an excellent 4.6/5 in absolute terms, though this fell 0.12 points below the category average of 4.72/5, reflecting the generally strong feedback control across modern prescription devices. The device showed meaningful improvement from initial to tuned fitting, with the normalized score rising from 4.2/5 to 4.6/5 after professional adjustment. This suggests that working with a hearing care professional to optimize settings can unlock additional performance, particularly for speech understanding. The Pure Charge&Go MaX appears well-suited for users who prioritize natural own-voice quality and improved conversation clarity in moderately noisy settings.