Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
Cearvol Wave vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
Cearvol Wave3.3
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.5
Speech in noise
Cearvol Wave3.2
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX2.6
Own voice
Cearvol Wave1.5
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX1.5
Feedback handling
Cearvol Wave3.8
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.3
Music streaming
Cearvol Wave4.5
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX0.0
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Audio scenes
Using MUSHRA scenes (Tuned)
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
No sample
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
Cearvol WaveSignia Silk Charge&Go IX
Ear CouplingClosed Dome
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
ReceiverIntegrated in device
Receiver–
Fitting FormulaProprietary manufacturer default
Fitting Formula–
Listening ProgramRestaurant
Listening Program–
Volume Setting40% (4/10 Default)
Volume Setting–
Software Versionv0.2.0.0
Software Version–
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram, 3-Band equalizer adjusted, Other settings at manufacturer defaults
Tuning Adjustments–
NotesProduct Evaluation Ongoing.
Notes–