Autiphon U0 Series vs EarCentric EX2

The Autiphon U0 Series is a budget amplification product available at $99, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.0/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. This visible-in-ear device ranks #6 of 8 amplification products tested, placing it in the top 63% of its category. In our testing, the U0 Series demonstrates excellent feedback handling at 5.0/5, scoring 0.72 points above the category average. This means users can expect stable performance without the whistling issues that plague some amplifiers. Speech in quiet environments scores 2.3/5—above the category average by 0.22 points, though only mixed in absolute terms. The device shows notable limitations in other areas. Speech in noise performance is low at 1.0/5, falling 0.37 points below the category average, which may make challenging listening environments difficult. Music streaming is the weakest area at 0.0/5, coming in 1.16 points below category average—users seeking audio streaming functionality should look elsewhere. The Autiphon U0 Series is best suited for budget-conscious consumers who primarily need basic amplification in quieter settings and prioritize reliable, feedback-free operation over advanced features. The rechargeable batteries add convenience at this price point. However, those who frequently encounter noisy environments or want to stream music should consider alternatives despite the higher cost.

The EarCentric EX2 is a budget-priced prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2021, earning a C grade with a SoundScore of 2.7/5 in HearAdvisor's lab testing. At $218, it ranks #33 of 36 prescription hearing aids tested, placing it in the bottom 11% of its category. In our testing, the EX2 showed a significant split in performance. Feedback handling was excellent at 4.7/5, essentially matching the category average and demonstrating stable operation during movement. However, speech performance was notably limited, with both speech in quiet and speech in noise scoring 1.0/5—well below the category averages of 3.32 and 1.96 respectively. Music streaming scored 0.0/5, falling 2.64 points below the prescription category average of 2.64/5. Own-voice comfort scored 2.3/5, a mixed result that sits 0.45 points below the category average. The device uses a rechargeable battery, which adds convenience for daily use. Notably, tuning did not improve performance in our testing—the Initial and Tuned fit scores were identical at 2.7/5. Budget-conscious shoppers in this price range may want to compare alternatives. The RxEars Rxi scored 4.09/5 at a similar price point, while OTC options like the Audien Hearing Atom offer comparable or better sound performance at lower prices. The EX2 may suit users who prioritize feedback stability and rechargeable convenience over speech clarity, but its limited speech performance is a significant tradeoff.