Audicus Omni 2 vs Eargo 5

The Audicus Omni 2 is a premium behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid priced at $1,898 that earned an A grade in our lab testing, placing it in the top 6% of the 65 OTC hearing aids we've evaluated. This two-time Expert's Choice Award winner (2023 and 2024) delivers consistently strong performance across multiple listening scenarios. In our testing, the Omni 2 demonstrated particular strength in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 4.2/5—a strong result that sits 1.38 points above the category average. Music streaming quality also impressed at 3.6/5, exceeding the category average by 1.68 points. Speech understanding in noisy environments scored 2.3/5, which is above the category average of 1.48 but represents mixed performance in absolute terms—meaning challenging noise situations may still prove difficult. The device offers flexible power options with both rechargeable and disposable batteries, and supports streaming from both iPhone and Android devices with hands-free capability. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.5/5, essentially matching the category average, while own-voice comfort scores a solid 3.0/5. The Audicus Omni 2 is best suited for consumers seeking a premium OTC option with strong everyday speech clarity and quality streaming capabilities. Those frequently in very noisy environments should set realistic expectations, though the device still outperforms most OTC competitors in these conditions.

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device offers a discreet rechargeable design, though its acoustic performance shows notable strengths and weaknesses compared to alternatives in its price range. In our testing, the Eargo 5 demonstrates solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.5/5, scoring 0.75 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also measures above average, which may appeal to users sensitive to occlusion effects. However, speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.4/5, and music streaming scores 0.0/5—significantly below the category average of 1.92/5. Users who prioritize phone streaming or frequently encounter noisy environments should consider these limitations. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The device uses closed sleeves for ear coupling in both initial and tuned configurations, with minimal score improvement from tuning (3.6 to 3.7/5). At this price point, competitors like the Lucid Tala (4.63/5) and Audicus Omni 2 (4.61/5) offer substantially higher overall sound performance. Budget-conscious shoppers may also find similar or better sound quality from lower-priced options like the Sony CRE-C10. The Eargo 5 may suit users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and quiet-environment listening over streaming and noise performance.