Audicus Omni 2 vs Eargo 5

The Audicus Omni 2 is a premium-priced behind-the-ear OTC hearing aid available for $1,898. With a SoundScore of 4.6/5 and an A grade, it ranks #5 among 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 6% of its category. In our lab testing, the Omni 2 demonstrates strong speech clarity in quiet environments, scoring 4.2/5—well above the category average by 1.38 points. Speech in noise performance is more modest at 2.3/5, which is above the category average by 0.79 points but mixed in absolute terms. This pattern suggests the device handles everyday conversations well while challenging listening situations may still present difficulty. Music streaming is a particular strength, scoring 3.6/5 and exceeding the category average by a substantial 1.68 points. Feedback handling is excellent at 4.5/5, virtually matching the category average. Own-voice comfort scores a solid 3.0/5, which is 0.49 points above average for OTC devices. The Omni 2 offers both rechargeable and disposable battery options, along with streaming compatibility for iPhone and Android devices with hands-free capability. It has earned Expert's Choice Awards for both 2023 and 2024. Consumers seeking alternatives in this price range may also consider the similarly-priced Lucid Tala, while the lower-priced Lexie B3 offers competitive performance for those with tighter budgets.

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) featuring an invisible-in-ear design with rechargeable batteries. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 52% of the OTC hearing aid category. This device demonstrates solid performance for speech understanding in quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—0.75 points above the category average of 2.79/5. Own-voice comfort also measures above average at 2.8/5 (+0.29 vs category), though this remains mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.2/5, providing reliable stability during wear. However, the Eargo 5 shows notable limitations in other areas. Speech in noise performance is low at 1.4/5, slightly below the category average. Most significantly, music streaming scored 0.0/5, falling 1.92 points below the category average—this device does not support audio streaming functionality. The invisible-in-ear form factor appeals to users prioritizing discretion, and the closed sleeve coupling remains consistent between initial and tuned fits. Tuning provided modest improvement, moving from a normalized Initial Score of 3.5/5 to a Tuned Score of 3.7/5. Given its premium price point, consumers may want to compare against alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 or Nuance Audio Glasses, which offer similar or better sound performance at lower price points. The Eargo 5 is best suited for users who prioritize cosmetic discretion and primarily need help with speech in quieter settings.