Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The Apple AirPods Pro 2 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 26% of OTC hearing aids tested. At $249, it represents one of the more affordable options in the category while delivering strong overall performance. In our testing, the AirPods Pro 2 shows particular strength in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 4.2/5—a strong result that sits 1.38 points above the category average. Music streaming is where this device truly excels, earning 4.4/5 and outperforming the category average by a substantial 2.48 points. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users should experience virtually no whistling issues. The device does have limitations. Own-voice comfort scores 1.9/5, which is low in absolute terms and 0.61 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds different or boomy. Speech in noise performance is above average for the category at 2.3/5 (+0.77 points), but this remains a mixed result in absolute terms, suggesting challenging listening environments will still be difficult. The AirPods Pro 2 is best suited for consumers already in the Apple ecosystem who want hearing support primarily in quieter settings and value excellent music and media streaming. Those frequently in noisy environments or sensitive to own-voice changes may want to consider alternatives.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product at $375 that earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This hearing glasses device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category, placing it in the top 13% of its class. This device excels in areas that complement its lifestyle-focused design. Music streaming performance is strong at 4.3/5, scoring 3.14 points above the category average—a standout result for amplification products. Own-voice comfort is excellent at 4.7/5, measuring 2.06 points above category average, meaning users should experience minimal occlusion or unnatural sound when speaking. However, core speech amplification metrics reveal limitations. Speech in quiet scores 2.7/5, which is 0.62 points above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise is low at 1.6/5, though still 0.25 points above the category average of 1.37/5. Feedback handling is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average—users may experience more whistling or instability than with other amplification devices. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is best suited for consumers who prioritize music streaming quality and comfortable own-voice perception over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking primary amplification for conversation in challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech performance.